My Photo
AddThis Feed Button

Most Excellent Folks

« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

My World Became Flat

I am about halfway through Thomas Friedman's book The World is Flat.  I go to work on Monday and one of my co-workers tells me a story of just how flat our world at work is.  I am relatively sure this gentleman has never heard of Tom or his book.  But he tells me with excitement, "Dave you gotta hear this!  We are working over the weekend on this project.  The equipment is made in Italy, the tools we are using are made in China, we are Americans (although he is an American, he was born in Puerto Rico) and our company is owned by Japanese!"

Tom spends over five-hundred pages in his book explaining how the world is flat.  It's fascinating.  Briefly, countries throughout the world are opening up, (Berlin Wall came down), the Internet came along packing unbridled communication in its holsters, work flow software, outsourcing and offshoring are just a few flattening factors.  Remove walls and boundaries; lubricate communication.  You still have a neighborhood market, its just that a few of the stores are ten thousand miles away.

Tom has caused me to view American industries farming labor overseas in an entirely different light.  I used to think, poor American workers losing their jobs.  But reality says that labor intensive work is more cost effective overseas.  And instead of our workers migrating to the next labor job that can be performed abroad, we need Americans to plug into positions where they can add value.  Instead of working on an assembly line, maybe design, repair and maintain the assembly line.  I am thinking out loud here but whatever we do, we as workers must add value to the finished product or service.

Book Mashups and Beyond

What do you get when you mix a book on completing tasks with a book on relationships?  Effectiveness that proliferates.  That's my take.  Glenn, over at All Business, talks about this book mashup.  Book mashups...see, when I go mining on the Internet for nuggets of different, this kind of idea is exactly what I am hoping to find.  Superb idea Glenn!

Can you come up with some book mashups?

A mashup's code, no matter the mashup, is the very essence of creativity; a combination of dissimilar entities.  Here are a couple of mashups that seem to be working pretty well:

As you traverse about, gather in data from all around, mash it up and see what you come up with.

For instance: while standing in my garage I notice my lawnmower.  I then look up and see a neighborhood kid.  What are the results of this mashup?  An afternoon on the couch watching the ballgames.


RadioBack Mission: deviantART

Mission.

Who Are You??

Who are you?
Who, who, who, who?
Who are you?

Quick, what comes to your mind?  Roger Daltrey and the lads or William, Marg, Jorja and CSI?

Who are you and what characteristics do you want associated with Brand You?

Just came back from Escape from Cubicle NationPamela Slim writes a most insightful article titled, Are you in the mom or (dad) Closet?  Pamela leads with:

Nataly Kogan, a former venture capitalist who very recently flew the corporate coop (yeah Nataly!) to co-found a company called Work-it Mom, recently wrote a blog post calling for perspectives on what she calls the "coming out of the mom closet." It was spurred by a conversation with a potential contributing writer to her site who said:

“I really like what you’re doing but I try to not be associated with mommy sites. I don’t want to be pigeonholed as a mommy blogger.”

Egads!   Someone called me a mommy blogger! Being called a mommy blogger could be a banner for some and a cement block for others.

Pamela goes on to list a few guidelines for authors to follow in regards to the mommy blogger label.  While writing a comment to Pamela I wondered, are authors aware of how their actions are perceived?  For those of us who are conscious about such stuff, our intent is to write in such a way as to create a perception.  Some don't think about it and it all comes out as intended.  Still others could care less and probably end up not reaching desired results.

I have been writing online since the mid-nineties.  I have always been acutely aware of how I wanted to be perceived.  I have a list of desired dave-brand traits.  I wonder how your perceptions match up to my intentions????  Feel free to comment on these.  Matter of fact, I think this could be a fun meme to pass around.

Who are you?  Who, who, who, who,  Who are you?

It's all about your audience man!  Who did you think you were writing to?  Boomers or the Connected Generation?

btw, every time that I walk away from Pamela's Escape from Cubicle Nation, I walk away refreshed and energized...I think its got something to do with the name of her site :-)

The Art of the Book Review

This is about why I write book reviews...

I am Cliff-Noting* a book for future review when I notice the Copyright date is 2003.  For a nanosecond I think, "Gee Dave, you aren't very hip, are you?"  The fact is, I do not write here to be hip...though I'm not sure I could be even if I tried.  For me this is all about the journey towards self learning.  Reading and subsequent book reviews are foot steps on the road to personal clarification. 

Before proceeding to more about the why...

It has been mentioned that my writing is not very critical or deep in meaning.  Even though I've no desire to be critical, (in the context of severe judgment), I have no time for it.  My mission is to glean stuff that I connect with, not extract points of contention and then debate it, or to show folks how smart I am by thinking up ways to demonstrate opposing views (which I'm not).  As for meaning, my writing means something to me.  If it is judged shallow, so be it.

One must know their audience and write for it...

My point is I must know myself, write, and then if an audience develops, that's just icing on the cake.  To be sure, I yearn for conversation with like-minded folks.  Unless I am authentic however, we will never connect.  So the only way I can write is to write for myself and hope to connect.

Back to why...

There are two reasons why I like books:

  • I like that.  I'm like that.
  • I like that.  I want it to be like that.

The first point is directly out of Virginia Postrel's book, The Substance of Style.  Virginia uses this phrase within the framework of aesthetic identity and design.  Although I absolutely sync with Virginia's definition, for me it is a connection point with a book's author.  The second point is the author speaking about something that I yearn for.   One example years ago that pierced my psyche with such impact that my grandchildren's children will oneday feel was Marcus Buckingham's book, First, Break all the Rules.  Marcus's teachings were universes away from the toxic environment of command and control of which I was immersed.

So, consequently:

  • I like that.  I want to write about that.

...and it really isn't any more deep than that.

So, to know Dave is to know what he reads.  Here is what he reads.

*I copped the term and technique of Cliff Noting from Tim Sanders who describes the process in his book, Love is the Killer App.

RadioBack Mission: Roger von Oech

RadioBack

Tampa

Most Excellent Books

  • Chip & Dan Heath: Made to Stick

Shelfari

  • Shelfari

Google Book Search

Most Excellent Learning Adventure Team